We started on dispute resolution:
https://faoblog.com/processes-ar-collections-dispute-resolution/
The very definition of the word dispute presumes a disagreement. The fact that the understandings and assumptions can be different are fundamental to a disagreement, may lead to a dispute. Either your client or his customer can become rigid on some point pertaining to a transaction and claim that his contention is correct. The thin line between a disagreement and a dispute is defined by the fact that in a disagreement both parties have a different opinion about some clauses or happenings of a transaction, and are open to look at various terms for a reconciliation / correct legal stand, whereas in a dispute, when such a reconciliation is not reached, or one party has a situation where the legal stand cannot be honored by him, a dispute arises and it does not just require researching on the facts, but will lead to waivers / special handling of situations, mandating approvals by an authorized person or a committee or a department.
Subscription and Guest Post:
You may subscribe to the blog from the subscription box on the opening page of the blog. We have enabled a button on the top of the first page, which will enable you share your posts. If you wish to write about any of the current streams, you can do it at https://faoblog.com/guest-post/. We will review your post and release it within 48 hours of your posting.
I want to convey my love for your kindness giving support to those people that actually need assistance with your niche. Your personal dedication to getting the message all through was unbelievably helpful and has constantly empowered associates much like me to attain their goals. Your amazing important publication can mean a whole lot to me and extremely more to my office colleagues. Best wishes from everyone of us.
hello good blog
Hubert Kögler •
Hi,
Just a comment on your start, “the definitionion presumes disagreement”.
Putare means to put. The french have this word in their “Argot” too, meaning something else. Basically it meant adding/offering not disgreeing.
An interesting and related fact is the medieval disputation rule also known as the rule of the Dominicans. This was developped when they tried to find out things like for example whether thoughts belong to an individual or are a gift from above or how to unterstand the divine trinity, three being one, and such.
The rule said that someone who wanted to add a view he was obliged to repeat to the satisfaction of the forerunning speaker the point that this speaker made. Only if this was agreed could one add one’s view.
I’ve tried to get this practiced when the heat of a debates increased. It works wonders.
Hubert
Hubert
Interesting